Prediction of Candy Reynolds vs Tanya Harford Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Reynolds vs T. Harford

Candy Reynolds

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Tanya Harford

RSA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Reynolds 1 - 0 Harford

They have played 3 sets in total, with Candy Reynolds winning 2 and Tanya Harford winning 1. The last match between Candy Reynolds and Tanya Harford was at the Sydney, 01-12-1980, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Candy Reynolds getting the victory 7-5 3-6 6-0.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Reynolds	1
Harford	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Sydney(12-01-80)

Stats

Candy Reynolds

Tanya Harford

C. Reynolds vs T. Harford H2H Profile

C. Reynolds	Stats	T. Harford
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
43.46% (166-216)	Career Total W/L	45.75% (70-83)
1	Grass	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Reynolds vs T. Harford Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Candy Reynolds has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tanya Harford has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Candy Reynolds, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tanya Harford has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Candy Reynolds has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tanya Harford has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Candy Reynolds has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tanya Harford winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Candy Reynolds has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 35/40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 20/33). Tanya Harford has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 9/8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 16/21).
Player level: In the last year, Candy Reynolds has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tanya Harford has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Candy Reynolds winning 1 times and Tanya Harford being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Candy Reynolds winning 2 and Tanya Harford winning 1.
The last match between Candy Reynolds and Tanya Harford was at the Sydney, 01-12-1980, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Candy Reynolds getting the victory 7-5 3-6 6-0.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Candy Reynolds has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tanya Harford has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Candy Reynolds has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tanya Harford has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Candy Reynolds has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tanya Harford has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Candy Reynolds vs Tanya Harford Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Reynolds vs T. Harford H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Reynolds	Stats	T. Harford
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
16	Games Won	11
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Reynolds Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 26-06-1989
Q2 Maria LindstromM. Lindstrom	W	6-2 7-6	Stats
Q1 Lisa OneillL. Oneill	W	4-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
Q3 Michelle Jaggard LaiM. Jaggard	L	7-5 6-7 6-2	Stats
Houston - 24-04-1989
Q1 Sylvia SchenckS. Schenck	W	6-4 7-5	Stats
Amelia Island - 10-04-1989
R2 Angelika KanellopoulouA. Kanellopoulou	L	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

T. Harford Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 31-08-1982
R1 Rosie CasalsR. Casals	L	5-7 6-4 6-2	Stats
Mahwah - 23-08-1982
Q1 Marcela SkuherskaM. Skuherska	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 21-06-1982
Q3 Nancy NeviaserN. Neviaser	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
R1 Lea AntonoplisL. Antonoplis	W	6-2 6-4	Stats
R2 Liz GordonL. Gordon	W	6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

C. Reynolds vs T. Harford Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Reynolds	Stats	T. Harford
43.46% (166/216)	YTD Win/Loss	45.75% (70/83)
45.63% (392/467)	Sets Win/Loss	47.04% (167/188)
48.46% (3814/4056)	Games Win/Loss	48.40% (1570/1674)
43.21% (35/46)	Hard Win/Loss	43.24% (16/21)
37.74% (20/33)	Clay Win/Loss	52.94% (9/8)
44.83% (39/48)	Indoor Hard W/L	41.38% (12/17)
46.67% (35/40)	Grass Win/Loss	45.16% (14/17)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
0	Average Opponent Rank	146.66
63.64% (7/4)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/2)
50.00% (2/2)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
60.00% (24/16)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
38.33% (23/37)	Futures W/L	48.48% (16/17)
44% (163/369)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	46% (69/151)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
50% (2/4)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	100% (1/1)
43% (50/115)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (24/53)
80% (178/142)	1st Set Won, Won Match	81% (73/59)
20% (178/36)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	19% (73/14)
11% (195/21)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (78/10)